The sliding block (04.06.2008 / focus / Page 3) - Young World tries a little reporting before
Excerpt:
Therefore, the question is obvious: What is the role of the committee in shaping the world to? Some of the loudest critics call the circle as a "secret world government" to see the participants and members of Bilderberg in a large conspiracy involved. But differentiation is necessary. The available information on Bilderberg, critical journalists and academics have gathered point, confronted primarily to be a general phenomenon, with the democratic states: For decades is to observe how the policy formation process provided not only for the institutions taking place, but instead shifts in elite groups, which operate far from public visibility.
We also note the recommendation of the book about boys world:
By Marcus Klöckner example, is the author of "power elites and elite circles. A sociological analysis ", published by VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 122 pages, 49 €
So please, what citizens - except now, boy world reader - buys a" sociological analysis "of 122 pages for 50 EUR? Probably The book is A0. And who's to say that there is anything very sensible of it?Again, many questions, the most interesting is why the journalists, who deal with the Bilderbergers have not been named. There are only a handful who were there, and A. James P. Tucker, Daniel Estulin, Alex Jones ...
And why, if the boy has a sufficiently vague world, announced the newspaper does not indicate that it sends investigative journalist for the meeting. A completely uncritical report. One might think is the Bilderberg meeting is nothing more than a skate night.
Yes, what does one expect from the mass media, even if they present themselves as in the example above, the appearance of intelligence as it is in fact only a pseudo-intellectual ejaculate for the useless eaters.
0 comments:
Post a Comment